Skip to content

Conversation

@KrissDrawing
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR addresses #5528

  • Addresses the issue in full
  • Addresses only certain aspects of the issue

Description

Adds additional fields for application status.

How Can This Be Tested/Reviewed?

On partners go to applications page for listing with enableApplicationStatus flag, add/edit application it should have additional fields for Application data (wait list and wait list - declined status).
When you add those, they should switch to non editable fields for different statuses than above.
also check if lottery field is present if reviewOrder is lottery, and not visible if it's not.

Author Checklist:

  • Added QA notes to the issue with applicable URLs
  • Reviewed in a desktop view
  • Reviewed in a mobile view
  • Reviewed considering accessibility
  • Added tests covering the changes
  • Made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • Ran yarn generate:client and/or created a migration when required

Review Process:

  • Read and understand the issue
  • Ensure the author has added QA notes
  • Review the code itself from a style point of view
  • Pull the changes down locally and test that the acceptance criteria is met
  • Either (1) explicitly ask a clarifying question, (2) request changes, or (3) approve the PR, even if there are very small remaining changes, if you don't need to re-review after the updates

@KrissDrawing KrissDrawing added the 1 review needed Requires 1 more review before ready to merge label Dec 30, 2025
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 30, 2025

Deploy Preview for bloom-flagly canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 3e9c610
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/bloom-flagly/deploys/6953dab9ed7c7e000876f7dc

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 30, 2025

Deploy Preview for partners-bloom-dev ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 3e9c610
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/partners-bloom-dev/deploys/6953dab95b77c600087952d8
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-5729--partners-bloom-dev.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 30, 2025

Deploy Preview for bloom-angelopolis canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 3e9c610
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/bloom-angelopolis/deploys/6953dab9fe3ec1000897ed84

--field-value-help-text-color: var(--seeds-input-text-label-color);
}

.field-value-field-style {
Copy link
Collaborator

@emilyjablonski emilyjablonski Jan 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

question: Can you walk me through why we needed these styles? Ideally we never need overrides 🤞 Would also love the padding the match the detail FieldValue so that it's flush to the left

Image Image

Copy link
Collaborator

@emilyjablonski emilyjablonski Jan 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we do need these overrides, we can make a scss module file FormApplicationData.module.scss that lives right next to the component file and put the styles in there

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image It's not that we need that it's just it looks awkward without it, especially when you switch between waitlist and non waitlist status and it jumps significantly. Not sure if it is ok to modify it to this point, but at least font-family and padding-top on label seem to be reasonable alignment. But i can live without it (i hope :)) Unless we maybe just want to use `disabled` prop on `Field` 🤔 image

Copy link
Collaborator

@emilyjablonski emilyjablonski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is looking great!! Just have a few more trivial comments

@emilyjablonski emilyjablonski added needs changes The author must make changes and then re-request review before merging and removed 1 review needed Requires 1 more review before ready to merge labels Jan 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs changes The author must make changes and then re-request review before merging

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants